'The worst of all time': Donald Trump rails against Time magazine's 'extremely poor' cover picture.

This is a positive story in a publication that Trump has long exalted – except for one issue. The front-page image, the president decreed, ""could be the worst ever".

Time magazine's praise to Trump's role in brokering a Gaza ceasefire, headlining its early November edition, was presented alongside a image of Trump taken from below and with the sun positioned behind him.

The result, he says, is "super bad".

"The publication wrote a quite favorable story about me, but the photo may be the Worst of All Time", Trump wrote on his social media platform.

“They ‘disappeared’ my hair, and then had an object hovering on top of my head that appeared as a floating crown, but an extremely small one. Quite bizarre! I consistently avoided taking pictures from below viewpoints, but this is a extremely poor picture, and deserves to be called out. What is their intention, and why?”

The president has expressed obvious his ambition to feature on Time magazine's front page and achieved this multiple times in the past year. This fixation has extended to Trump’s golf clubs – in 2017, the publication requested to remove fabricated front pages shown in a few of his establishments.

The most recent cover image was taken by a photographer for a news agency at the presidential residence on the fifth of October.

Its angle did no favours for Trump’s chin and neck – a chance that the governor of California Gavin Newsom seized, with the governor's office posting a modified photo with the offending area pixelated.

{The Israeli captives in Gaza have been released under the initial stage of Trump's ceasefire agreement, in exchange for a release of Palestinian detainees. This agreement may become a major success of his next term, and it may represent a strategic turning point for the region.

Simultaneously, a defense of his portrayal has been offered by an unexpected source: the communications chief at Moscow's diplomatic office came forward to condemn the "revealing" picture decision.

It's amazing: a photo says more about those who chose it than about the subject. Only disturbed individuals, people obsessed with malice and animosity –perhaps even perverts – could have selected such an image", she posted on her social channel.

In light of the positive pictures of President Biden that that magazine displayed on the cover, despite his physical infirmity, the story is simply self-incriminating for the magazine", she noted.

The response to the president's inquiries – what did the editors intend, and why? – may be something to do with artistically representing a sense of power says Carly Earl, Guardian Australia’s picture editor.

The photograph technically technically is good," she notes. "They selected this photo because they wanted Trump to look heroic. Staring up at someone creates an impression of their majesty and his expression actually looks reflective and almost a bit ethereal. It's rare you see pictures of him in such a serene moment – the photo appears gentle."

The president's hair seems to vanish because the sunlight behind him has washed out that area of the image, producing a glowing aura, she says. And, while the article's title pairs nicely with Trump’s expression in the image, "you can’t always please the individual in question."

Nobody enjoys being captured from low angles, and even if all of the artistic aspects of the image are very strong, the aesthetics are unflattering."

The publication contacted the periodical for feedback.